Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Mini-plate removal in maxillofacial trauma patients during a five-year retrospective study

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2016³â 42±Ç 4È£ p.182 ~ 186
¹ÚÇöÃá, ±è¼ö°ü, ¿ÀÁö¼ö, À¯Àç½Ä, ±è¿ø±â,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÇöÃá ( Park Hyun-Chun ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
±è¼ö°ü ( Kim Su-Gwan ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
¿ÀÁö¼ö ( Oh Ji-Su ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
À¯Àç½Ä ( You Jae-Seek ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
±è¿ø±â ( Kim Won-Gi ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract


Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of indications for the removal of mini-plates over a five-year period in maxillofacial trauma patients.

Materials and Methods: The medical records of 530 patients who underwent treatment with mini-plate fixation after maxillofacial trauma were reviewed for a five-year period (May 2007 to May 2012). Patients were evaluated concerning the number of mini-plates removed, age and gender distributions, time between insertion and removal, indication for removal, and site of removal.

Results: The plates of 120 patients were removed (26 females and 94 males). The removal rate was 22.6%. The most frequent indication for removal was patient demand (81.7%), followed by tooth extraction (7.5%), and pain (3.3%). The most frequent removal site was the mandible (95.0%).

Conclusion: The number of mini-plates removed was small, and the most common indication for removal was patient demand. There is no evidence to support a recommendation for the routine removal of titanium mini-plates.

Å°¿öµå

Fracture; Internal fixation; Trauma

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed